News

Food fight builds as regulators weigh ‘added sugar’ label

Food fight builds as regulators weigh ‘added sugar’ label

SUGAR:U.S. food regulators say the public needs to know how much sugar manufacturers add to their products, beyond the sweetener that naturally occurs in the raw ingredients. Companies such as Campbell Soup Company say they don't need to inform the public, and that making a distinction risks dangerous confusion. Photo: Reuters

By Chris Prentice

NEW YORK (Reuters) – In Washington, a pivotal battle over sugar is heating up. One small corner of the wider culture war over public health and sweeteners, this fight isn’t about how much sugar should be in your food, but how much you should know about it.

U.S. food regulators say the public needs to know how much sugar manufacturers add to their products, beyond the sweetener that naturally occurs in the raw ingredients. Companies such as Campbell Soup Company say they don’t need to inform the public, and that making a distinction risks dangerous confusion.

This week the Food and Drug Administration will begin reviewing thousands of public comments on proposed new labeling regulations that would require food makers to specify how much sugar they are adding to products. Current labeling laws only require them to list total sugar content.

The move marks U.S. regulators’ first significant step to address a growing clamor from health groups and scientists who say that excessive sugar consumption is a key culprit in the nation’s obesity and diabetes epidemics.

It also comes amid growing public demands for greater transparency in the U.S. food supply chain, fueled by interest in everything from animal welfare to genetically modified grain.

“There’s been an increasing drum beat on the part of public health advocates to give consumers that information,” says Michael Jacobson, the head of nonprofit food advocacy group Center for Science in the Public Interest, which has spent decades crusading to tackle high sugar levels.

Jacobson said he was “delighted and almost in disbelief” when he heard of the FDA’s plans, which were announced in February.

Not everyone is thrilled. If added, the line would be a major blow for sweetener companies already battling each other in an overcrowded industry as the growth of America’s massive sweet tooth stalls.

It is impossible to determine how many sugars have been added to a container of yogurt, unless companies choose to disclose it. Sugar is used to enhanced flavor in a wide range of products, beyond simply cookies and sodas.

The fight is about to get serious, with lobbyists on either side expected to step up pressure as the FDA reviews public comments ahead of issuing a final rule. From there, it would likely be years before companies are required to update their labels.

‘SUGAR IS SUGAR’

U.S. government data shows that per capita consumption of caloric sweeteners has been declining for over a decade, but health groups say it is well above healthy levels.

Some nutrition experts and scientists say sugars that are added to foods are greater contributors to weight gain, adding calories without the benefit of other nutrients. A few even say sugar itself is toxic.

That stance remains a controversial one. Food manufacturers and sugar companies resoundingly say there is not enough evidence to suggest “added sugars” contribute differently to weight gain than sugars that are intrinsic to a piece of fruit.

“Sugar is sugar, regardless of the source,” Campbell Soup Company, the maker of Pepperidge Farm and Prego products, wrote in a letter to the FDA.

“Giving consumers a false impression that reducing added sugars without reducing calories may actually delay finding a real solution the problem” of obesity, Lisa J. Thorsten, the company’s director of regulatory affairs and nutrition, wrote.

The Sugar Association, which represents the makers of household brands, including Domino Sugar and Imperial Sugar, went further, saying the lack of scientific evidence to justify the line sets an “alarming precedent.”

But CSPI’s Jacobson and a number of other health advocates insist that added sugar are different and are hidden sources of empty calories at the very least.

The American Heart Association recommends that women, for example, consume no more than about 6 teaspoons of added sugars each day. That is less than the amount in a 12-ounce can of Coca-Cola.

The World Health Organization in March issued a draft of new guidelines advocating people cut the recommended amount of added sugars they eat in half, updating the guidelines it introduced a decade ago.

“The big difference between now and then (is) we have a system to provide the guidelines,” said Francesco Branca, the WHO’s nutrition department director. “We have credibility from the scientific point of view that make these guidelines easier to defend.”

FOR ‘JUNK FOOD’ CRITIC, A LONG TIME COMING

Some critics doubt the effectiveness of the so-called “facts panel” overhaul. The U.S. government earlier this year said that just around half of all consumers read the labels and make decisions based on the information.

“The people who read labels are the people who are already watching their health and their weight. This isn’t going to cause a dramatic change,” said Baylen Linnekin, head of nonprofit Keep Food Legal and a critic of the labeling measure as well as other government involvement in the food sector, including subsidies.

The Sugar Association also said the move represents a concerning extension of regulatory power in requiring food makers to turn over private records to the U.S. government.

The regulators’ move underscores the growing public scrutiny of sugar consumption, a trend that cheers Jacobson, who has targeted soda makers and sued food companies in a self-appointed role as the nation’s “food cop.”

Washington-based public relations specialist and industry advocate Rick Berman says Jacobson is in the “food hysteria business” and dismisses the anti-sugar craze as a fad.

With industry lobbying efforts building up, Jacobson, 71, said he is “not planting the white flag yet.” But he is quietly savoring what could be the most meaningful step in his quest.

“It has been a long, long time.”

(Reporting by Chris Prentice; Editing by Dan Grebler)

Recent Headlines

in Local Sports

Soccer: Unbeaten Vikings win 3-0 at Central Washington

Fresh
wwu western washington university congrats vikes vikings from kpug

No.6 WWU scores three times in first 24 minutes in the Great Northwest Athletic Conference opener.

in Local Sports

Seahawks’ Sherman laughs off reports that he was ‘exposed’ in loss at San Diego

Fresh
San Diego Chargers wide receiver Eddie Royal, left, pushes off Seattle Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman during the second half of an NFL football game on Sunday, Sept. 14, 2014, in San Diego.

Sherman responds to critics following Seahawks' loss at San Diego; now turns attention to Super Bowl rematch Sunday against Broncos.

in Sports

Police: Cardinals RB Dwyer head-butted wife

This is a 2014 photo of Jonathan Dwyer of the Arizona Cardinals NFL football team. This image reflects the Arizona Cardinals active roster as of Monday, June 9, 2014 when this image was taken.

Police say Cardinals running back Jonathan Dwyer head-butted his wife and broke her nose, Cards also release Chris Rainey for his history of domestic violence.

in Entertainment

Kevin Spacey’s stalker sentenced to 4 years

kevin

A Massachusetts woman who threatened to torture the actor has been sentenced to more than four years behind bars.

in Sports

R&A set for historic vote on women members

FILE - In this July 17, 2013 file photo, the Royal and Ancient Golf Club's Chief Executive Peter Dawson listens during a press conference ahead of the British Open Golf Championship at Muirfield, Scotland. Dawson announced last month that he will retire in September 2015 as secretary of the Royal & Ancient Golf Club and chief executive of The R&A, a business division he wisely created 10 years ago. He will have served 16 years, the same tenure as the three R&A secretaries before him. What sets him apart is coping with perhaps the most challenging times in the club's 260-year history.

On the same day Scotland votes on whether to become independent, a historic sporting decision will be made inside arguably the most famous building in golf.